Ars Technica has posted a good review of Firefox 2.0 RC2 (release candidate 2). This review details the improvements over previous beta builds, as well as provides a good preview of the new features you can expect once Firefox 2.0 is released.
Ars Technica review:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/apps/firefox2-rc2.ars
Via Boing Boing:
"Last week, a 15-year-old girl at Caney Creek High School (near Houston) complained to her father [Alton Verm] about "bad language" in Ray Bradbury's classic SF novel Fahrenheit 451. Dad complained to the district and pushed for the book -- which tells the story of a man in a futuristic, totalitarian society whose job is to burn unapproved literature -- to be removed from the curriculum. As the icing on the cake, his request came during the last week of September, which just happens to be the American Library Association's Banned Books Week."
Best line in the article: "It's just all kinds of filth," said Alton Verm, adding that he had not read 'Fahrenheit 451'.
And as a bonus (also found on Boing Boing), here's some helpful family planning advice.
Google recently introduced a new search service specifically for source code. Google Code Search "helps you find function definitions and sample code by giving you one place to search publicly accessible source code hosted on the Internet." I played with it very briefly, and it definitely seems to have potential. A FAQ is also provided to help you get started.
CRN published an article covering Google Code Search. It's worth a quick read if you ever have a need for this sort of thing (which, admittedly, most folks do not).
Full links:
Google Code Search - http://google.com/codesearch
CRN article - http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml?articleId=193104796
I just updated Universal Extractor to version 1.3.1. This is primarily a bugfix release for version 1.3, focusing on improved 7-zip support, improved "default" checks for unknown .exe files, and Windows 9x compatability. I also made a few other small tweaks and fixes. As usual, full details can be found in the ChangeLog.
Version 1.3.1 can be download from the main Universal Extractor home page.
I just updated my Modify Path (ModPath) Inno Setup script. This is a small bugfix release that forces Inno Setup to prompt to restart if ModPath() is applied on a Windows 9x system.
If you're an Inno Setup developer, you may want to take a look. I also have a standalone script written in AutoIt that can do the same thing from the Windows command line for anyone else that may need this functionality.
... mostly. The Photo Gallery has been down for quite some time now, due to an unintended upgrade of the backend software that made it incompatible with my website. It's taken a while, but I finally got the new version up and running, and I've imported all of the existing photos into the new gallery.
The problem, however, is that integration with the rest of the website is still not available. So, if you click on the Photo Gallery link, you'll be taken to a separate, standalone page to view the gallery.
I'm planning a rather thorough overhaul of LegRoom.net in the near future, so this lack-of-integration will probably remain until then. Hopefully it won't be too much of an inconvenience.
If you find any problems, please let me know.
I just came across a really useful post on security/privacy blog 27B Stroke 6 discussing various resources available to check what data companies may have and sell about you, as well as how to opt out of some such schemes. I recommend checking out the full article, but in the interest of saving time I'm posting the major points below.
Full link:
http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/index.blog?entry_id=1532406
Microsoft recently commisioned research whore firm IDC to research and produce a report entitled, "The Economic Impact of Microsoft Windows Vista" (link to PDF). The executive summary essentially states that the upcoming release of Windows Vista will provide a huge boon to the European economy, and is a direct response into the Europeans Commission's inquiry into whether Microsoft is playing fair with this new release.
Now, I haven't posted much about either Microsoft or Linux in quite some time (nearly 2 years in fact, which probably isn't all that surprising given that I only posted 4 articles in all of 2005), simply because I'm content to sit and watch from the sidelines at this point. However, the news I read about this report struck me as rather odd. For example:
There are some other odd conclusions included in the report, but these are the two that are most puzzling to me. For example, the "$40 billion" statement doesn't sound like something they should brag about. To me, this reads as, "Microsoft will drain the European of up to $40 billion in the form of upgrades and license fees. Additional money must be spent replacing hardware that doesn't meet the minimum requirements of Microsoft's next OS, but could continue to function fine with current software or alternative operating systems." The only boon I see is for Microsoft, in the form of transferring an obscenely large amount of money from the European economy into its own coffers.
The second example is equally as puzzling. We're talking about an upgrade, not an entirely new or revolutionary product. IT workers today will continue to provide IT services tomorrow. The only reason I can think of that Windows Vista would provide such a huge increase in IT jobs is that it will take that much more manpower to deploy and support Vista-based systems. Again, this isn't exactly something I would brag about.
The reason I bring this up now is that I recently came across two good articles discussion the issue. The first, in Business Week, gives a broader overview of the issues involved, and is a good read to get caught up on this topic. The second, in Linux Journal takes a more focused approach by specifically discussing the IDC research report, comparing the report's "benefits" to real-world benefits obtainable through Open Source software.
If you're curious about this issue, I encourage reading both articles below:
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/sep2006/gb20060913_243817.htm
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000097
Want to know how your tax dollars are being spent? Jesse Bachman has done some extensive research on the issue and created an interactive diagram detailing how the federal government's discretionary budget is spent. Both interesting and enlightening:
SecurityFocus Mark Rasch has written a great article concerning the , including consumer protection laws, deception, fraud, and spyware. From the article:
Not only does the GLBA only cover a narrow scope of records, it also has some exclusions which are, well bizarre. It excludes law enforcement agents acting within the scope of their duties. This suggests that if the cops want your financial records, rather than going down the hall to the prosecutor to get a subpoena (or issuing an administrative subpoena, getting a search warrant, a FISA warrant, a FISA order, a National Security Letter, the consent of the bank, or any of the myriad legal ways to get your information) it would be permissible for the cops to simply call the bank, pretend to be you (or anyone else) and trick the bank into ponying up your records. Pretty cool. And if you challenge the legality of the search as a violation of your privacy, a court might very well conclude that these records about you aren?t your records, but rather records of the financial institution. Therefore, even if the search is unreasonable, you don?t have what the law terms standing to challenge it. Lovely.
