Yet another file format SQX

Hi!

Would it be possible to add SQX as a new archive type to the already overwhelming list of supported types?

Thanks!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
jbreland's picture

Re: Yet another file format SQX

I think I looked at this format in the past, but couldn't find a way to extract the files. In order to add support for any given format I need freely redistributable binary that can extract the files. I automate filetype detection and extraction with UniExtract, but with just a few exceptions all unpacking and extraction is done by the "helper" programs, such as 7-Zip. Do you happen to know of any utility that can do this?

--
http://www.legroom.net/

jbreland's picture

Re: Yet another file format SQX

I'd like to add a little more to this. During development of any new version of UniExtract, I often come across various new formats that I'd like to support, utilities that may aid the process, etc. I keep an archive of everything that I find, both for later analysis in case I find new ways of doing something as well as to simply remind myself of what I'd looked at previously. I just looked through this collection and I did find some stuff related to SQX. Basically, it's the two files available for download here:
http://www.sqx-archiver.org/download.html

If I recall correctly (I'm not able to actually run or test any of these programs right now), I believe that UnSqueez.exe couldn't be used because it lacks any kind of support for command line parameters (as far as I could tell, anyway). This means I can't pass the name of the file that I want to be extracted, the output directory, etc. I also tried poking through the SQX SDK, as sometimes SDKs will come with example command line utilities, but in this case I couldn't find anything useful. I also found a number of third-party utilities in my search, but nothing that is freely redistributable.

So, if you (or anyone else) can suggest a way of doing this then I'd be happy to add support for it, but otherwise there's not much I can do at this time.

--
http://www.legroom.net/